Pupil Premium Strategy 2018-2019
Pupil Premium Strategy 2018 -19
NOR | 373 |
Number of pupils eligible for PP funding | 170 |
Percentage of pupils eligible for PP funding | 46% |
Total Budget allocation | £228,920 |
Academy Deprivation Index | 0.3 |
Nominated member of AAB | Louise Chappell |
AAB PP Review dates | 22.11.18 21.03.19 11.07.19 |
Outcomes of Previous Academic year
| All | PP | Others |
Key stage 2 Reading ARE | 74% | 76% | 71% |
Key stage 2 Reading GD | 15% | 11% | 20% |
Key stage 2 Writing ARE | 82% | 84% | 80% |
Key stage 2 Writing GD | 23% | 18% | 29% |
Key stage 2 Maths ARE | 77% | 82% | 71% |
Key stage 2 Maths GD | 12% | 5% | 20% |
Pupil Premium - What is Pupil Premium? |
Pupil Premium was introduced by the Department for Education (DfE) in 2011, as additional funding for pupils who receive Free School Meals and who are Looked After Children. This is because the DfE have recognised that good education is the key to improving young people’s life chances. This is particularly true for children from low-income families, or who are Looked After Children, research shows that without intervention these children are far less likely to leave schools with good GCSE results than other children. The Pupil Premium, using additional resources from outside the School’s Budget, is intended to address the current inequalities by ensuring that funding reaches the pupils who need it most. The Pupil Premium has also been introduced for children whose parents are currently serving in the armed forces. This service premium is designed to address the emotional and social well-being of these pupils. The DfE have stated that schools have the right to spend this funding as they see fit based upon their knowledge of pupil needs. There is obvious accountability that serves to ensure that the money is used effectively and to the benefit of these key groups. |
1. To continue to narrow the gap between pupil premium children and other in all year groups so they achieve ARE. 2. To increase the number of pupil premium children achieving greater depth. 3. Improve the attainment and progress of boys at ARE in all subjects and girls at GD in maths. Y3 · 26% of the cohort are SEND (10/39ch) · 48% of boys are working below ARE (10/21). Of those boys 80% (8/10) are SEND · 83% of girls are working within ARE. Y4 · 95% of boys were working within the age related curriculum (20/21 ch). · 88% of girls were working within the age related curriculum (15/17 ch). ** The progress of 2.2 children in reading and writing is a priority to ensure these children spend more time working at ARE independently. ** Challenge for 1 children in reading to ensure they are developing the depth of their answers. Y5 · 75% of pupil premium children were working within the age related curriculum by the end of the year but 30% are 2.2 children. · 70% of boys were working within the age related curriculum (19/27 ch) but the 2.2 children are a high priority. · 3 of the 8 boys not working within ARE are SEND children. The other 5 boys are a high priority. · 75% of girls were working within the age related curriculum (15/20 ch) but the 2.2 children are a high priority. · 2 of the 5 girls not working within ARE are SEND children. The other 3 girls are a high priority. Y6 · 80% of pupil premium children were working within the age related curriculum by the end of the year however, there is a large gap between the attainment of boys and girls. · 62% of boys were working within the age related curriculum (19/27 ch). · 7 of the 10 boys not working within ARE are SEND children. The other 3 boys are a high priority as they should not be more than a year behind. · 100% of girls were working within the age related curriculum and none are SEND.
|
Behaviour and Attendance |
Increased nurture support is required for the Year 3 cohort due to the high number of SEND children and the number of children requiring part time tables or one to one support. Thrive, parental support and in school nurture work requirements in Y4 – 6 remain high due to the high number of PP children in each year group and the number of open CIN/ CP cases or early help referrals. |
Current Pupils
Y3
Year group profile:
Total number | Boys | Girls | SEND |
39 | 21 | 18 | 10 - 2G 8B |
Reading RAG
| 1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 3 |
Total | 4 | 13 | 8 | 13 |
Boy/Girl | 2B 2G | 3B 10G | 5B 3G | 8B 3G |
SEND | 0 | 1 TN | 0 | 8 = 5B 3G |
Writing RAG
| 1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 3 |
Total | 4 | 9 | 13 | 12 |
Boy/Girl | 1B 3G | 3B 6G | 7B 6G | 7B 3G |
SEND | 0 | 0 | 1 Boy TN | 8 = 5B 3G |
Maths RAG
| 1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 3 |
Total | 8 | 7 | 15 | 8 |
Boy/Girl | 5B 3G | 4B 3G | 8B 7G | 5B 3G |
SEND | 1 Boy TN | 0 | 1B BH | 5 – 2B 3G |
Y3 | Specific intervention need |
1 | Nurture group daily for SEND/ Behaviour children |
2 | Pivats interventions and precision teaching |
3 | Phonics for reading and spelling |
4 | Daily reading and fluency intervention |
5 | Guided writing |
6 | Basic number and times table recall |
Y4
Year group profile:
Total number | Boys | Girls | SEND |
36 | 19 | 17 | 3G 0B |
Reading RAG
| 1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 3 |
Total | 15 | 9 | 7 | 5 |
Boy/Girl | 8B 7G | 5B 4G | 5B 2G | 1B 4G |
SEND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 all girls |
Writing RAG
| 1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 3 |
Total | 10 | 11 | 11 | 4 |
Boy/Girl | 3B 7G | 10B 1G | 5B 6G | 1B 3G |
SEND | 0 | 0 | 1G | 2G |
Maths RAG
| 1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 3 |
Total | 13 | 10 | 11 | 2 |
Boy/Girl | 7B 6G | 6B 4G | 5B 6G | 1B 1G |
SEND | 0 | 0 | 3G | 0 |
Y4 | Specific intervention need |
1 | Daily reading and fluency intervention |
2 | Reading comprehension |
3 | Phonics for reading and spelling |
4 | Pivats interventions and precision teaching |
5 | Guided writing |
6 | Basic number and times table recall |
Y5
Year group profile:
Total number | Boys | Girls | SEND |
50 | 25 | 25 | 11 |
Reading RAG
| 1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 3 |
Total | 7 | 14 | 13 | 16 |
Boy/Girl | 4G 3B | 9G 5B | 6G 7B | 6G 10B |
SEND | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
Writing RAG
| 1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 3 |
Total | 5 | 13 | 17 | 15 |
Boy/Girl | 3G 2B | 7G 6B | 9G 12B | 6G 9B |
SEND | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
Maths RAG
| 1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 3 | |||
Total | 4 | 17 | 17 | 12 | |||
Boy/Girl | 2G 2B | 11G 6B | 5G 12B | 7G 5B | |||
SEND | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 | |||
| Y5 | Specific intervention need |
| ||||
| 1 | PIVATS interventions and precision teaching |
| ||||
| 2 | Reading comprehension |
| ||||
| 3 | Spelling of high frequency words |
| ||||
| 4 | Daily reading and fluency intervention |
| ||||
| 5 | Behaviour for learning |
| ||||
| 6 | Basic number and times table recall |
| ||||
| 7 | Editing and improving writing |
| ||||
Y6
Year group profile:
Total number | Boys | Girls | SEND |
44 | 29 | 15 | 9 |
Reading RAG
| 1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 3 |
Total | 9 | 14 | 19 | 2 |
Boy/Girl | 4G 5B | 4G 10B | 7G 12B | 2B |
SEND | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 |
Writing RAG
| 1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 3 |
Total | 7 | 13 | 22 | 2 |
Boy/Girl | 4G 3B | 4G 9B | 8G 14B | 2B |
SEND | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 |
Maths RAG
| 1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 3 |
Total | 12 | 13 | 17 | 2 |
Boy/Girl | 4G 8B | 4G 9B | 7G 10B | 2B |
SEND | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 |
Y6 | Specific intervention need |
1 | Daily reading and fluency intervention |
2 | Reading comprehension intervention |
3 | Phonics and specific spelling intervention |
4 | PIVATS intervention and Precision teaching |
5 | Guided writing |
6 | Basic number and times table recall |
7 | Third Space Learning |
Autumn 1 review of impact
Additional Planned Use of Funding (Whole Academy) Planned spend = £228,920
- Teacher CPD – Quality first teaching has the biggest impact on pupil premium children attainment. The academy has 3 NQTs this year and 2 other new starters. High quality CPD is vital to ensure the children receive consistent good or better teaching daily. CPD focus = assessment in a lesson, planning that identifies how teaching will address identified gaps in children’s knowledge and how to plan and deliver effective interventions.
- PP reading, writing and maths book scrutiny training – barrier identification
- Year group target training and pupil identification
- Coaching – maths focused
- PP focused RAG meetings in every year group
- One to one CPD based on RAG barriers
- Year group data presentations – progress since September and towards end of year targets.
- TA training – use of questioning in a lesson, how to deliver effective interventions and feedback to children in a lesson. – Ongoing training delivered in maths. Feedforward training for TAs linked to writing.
- Additional support for any identified pupil premium children focused on knowledge gaps in reading, writing and maths.
- Subsidised school visits in every year group – every year group has had a subsidised visit during the autumn term.
- Subsidised breakfast and afterschool clubs – numbers need monitoring
- Thrive subscription and weekly sessions during the school day
- Focused nurture provision – Y3 and 5 are the priority year groups
- Attendance prizes and EWO time
- Free PE kits
Whole school initiative | What will it cost? | How many pupils will benefit? | Who will be responsible? | Impact? |
Teacher CPD to include DOL time and external trainers | £25,000 | All PP children | HOA to plan whole school CPD SLT and NQT mentors to identify CPD needs for individual teachers | Autumn CPD has been specifically focused on developing all teachers understanding of how to implement the PP strategy through data analysis and AFL, target setting and provision mapping. All teachers are very clear on who the PP ch are in their classes and the interventions they require. |
TA training to include SLT time, release time, external training | £20,000 | All PP children | HOA to plan whole school CPD SLT and TA line managers to identify CPD needs for individuals |
|
Targeted breakfast club to include food and Teacher and TA overtime for 1;1 and small group sessions. | £25,112 | 44 children | RS | Interventions happen daily. Magic breakfast will provide the food from Spring 1 onwards so the saving will be used to staff a Y5 morning intervention |
Daily 1:1 readers (staff overtime) | £8550 | All PP children below lime on the school book band system | Year group leaders and class teachers | All pupil premium children below age related are reading daily to an adult. However, the children are still not moving through the bands quickly enough. New book band trackers have been introduced so teachers ensure the children are tested and moved up frequently. The data will be checked 3 weekly in RAG meetings. |
Subsidised school visits | £20,000 | All PP children | Year group leaders and class teachers |
|
Subsidised school clubs | £10,000 | All PP children | SLT and RT | Needs monitoring |
Thrive subscription and 1:1 sessions for children | £18,000 | Targeted children identified through pastoral provision | AP Inclusion | Year 3 exclusions have reduced to zero. Classrooms and now calm and purposeful. |
Attendance prizes and EWO time | £12000 | All PP children | HOA | AR has taken over attendance – Spring 1 monitoring to show reduction of PP PAs |
PE Kits | £3000 | All PP children | HOA and RT | Purchased available for children |
Targeted Learning Director time | £17500 | All PP children | HOA | Improved Y6 outcomes |
Mathletics club (TA overtime) | £1767 | All PP children | Maths leader | Lunch time club – now times table rock start focused |
Colour band books - high interest books brown and below | £5000 | All PP children | HOA | In every classroom and used during one to one reading sessions. |
Pastoral support – learning mentor and Inclusion Officer (provides parental support) | £45,000 | All PP children and parents | HOA and AP Inclusion | This support is being given but measurable impact is required. Tracking of the number of parents and ch worked with to be introduced during the Spring term. |
Pupil rewards to support positive behaviour | £6000 | All PP children | AP Inclusion |
|
A1 Spending summary:
Staffing & CPD | £76,053.25 |
Online Learning Resources | £4,058.00 |
Resources | £745.47 |
Trips | £1,684.80 |
Attendance (inc breakfast) and reward points | £2,261.20 |
Total | £84,802.72 |
**staff absence has presented challenge to year groups 3 – 5**
Staff days | Frequency Rate | Average Sickness Days | % Staff with 1 or more sickness absence | |
Teaching Staff | 19 | 52.6% | 1.9 | 31.6% |
Non-Teaching Staff | 32 | 34.4% | 3.7 | 34.4% |
All Staff | 51 | 41.2% | 3.0 | 33.3% |
Year Group | Evidence of impact | barriers | Next steps |
3 | Reading – 44% - 47% @1 and 2.1 GD = 39% - 39% Writing – 36% - 42% @1 and 2.1 GD = 25% - 25% Maths – 39% - 44% GD = 22% - 31%
| High need cohort – two infants merging together – transition and PBA expectations. High SEND A high number of challenging behaviour (3 part time tables, 1 at Levett, numerous children that attacked adults) Attendance – parental engagement | Spring 2 onwards - LM time to be allocated to y3 and Y4 interventions. Teachers to bring class/ year group profile to every RAG meeting. Afternoon interventions to focus on Feedforward identified gaps or QLA areas in reading and maths. Teacher led learning conversations to focus on writing gaps. |
4 | Reading – 67% @1 and 2.1 GD 1 and 2.1 = 42% Writing – 58% - 53% @1 and 2.1 GD 1 and 2.1 = 42% Maths – 64% GD 1 and 2.1 = 53%
| Two NQTs in the team Year group leader had 6 weeks absence. 3 high needs pupils – behaviour and SEND. Attendance (particularly boys) TA confidence in delivering interventions and book banding. | New attendance leader to work one to one with children on attendance. New incentives. Parent support worker and AR to have regular meetings with parents of all ch below 95% Reading leader and Senco to model and support TAs during interventions. |
5 | Reading – 42% @1 and 2.1 GD 1 and 2.1 = 16% Writing –42% @1 and 2.1 GD 1 and 2.1 = 12% Maths – 36% GD 1 and 2.1 = 14%
| Two NQTs in the team 1 NQT on a cause for concern now long term sick. High send and vulnerable/ volatile ch. Attendance (OT especially). Teachers understanding & TAs confidence in designing and delivering interventions. | AP now in class full time and year group leader. VP supporting planning and the development of the year group leader role in y5. Also provide model lessons. AR to add additional capacity and to run interventions, model to TAs and monitor provision maps. Parent support worker and AR to have regular meetings with parents of all ch below 95% NQT mentors to support use of Feedforward and QLA to identify intervention needs. |
6 | Reading – 50% - 59% @1 and 2.1 GD 1 and 2.1 = 20% - 23% Writing –32% - 50% @1 and 2.1 GD 1 and 2.1 = 18% Maths – 50% - 61% GD 1 and 2.1 = 25 - 30%
| Knowledge gaps due to inconsistent teaching in y3 – 5. 1 girl & 1 boy – family bereavement 1 girl – attendance due to mum’s health. 1 boy CP now LAC. Attendance (EP and LN especially) | All PP ch attend interventions (tracked by RS) and changed according to need/ progress. Vulnerable ch group to be set up with SH. SH to sit in core lessons with identified ch. AR to develop the attendance champions starting with LN. |